InterfaceAnalyzer total score = 0.000
- Read more about InterfaceAnalyzer total score = 0.000
- 3 comments
- Log in or register to post comments
Hello, I want to design my protein wit XML script as the paper Rosetta and the Design of Ligand Binding Sites
I want to dock with ligand.wts(-restore_pre_talaris_2013_behavior )
and design protein with ref2015.wts.
But the option -restore_pre_talaris_2013_behavior seem to have impact in ref2015.wts.
How can I solve it?
Hi there:
I use snugDocking to Dock different antibody- antigens. I wonder how could I determine good binding vs bad binding from the result web page.
I am currently decide by look at 1. interface score 2, similarity of top 10 models. If the interface score is low and top 10 models have a couples model in similar position, I assume it is good binding, otherwise It isn't
give an example:
Hi, I am designing a protein interface of a nanobody with my target antigen.
1000 initial poses were generated by patchdock and 1000 designs were generated per each pose.
After ploting the ddg-rmsd scatter plot, I found all the poses has a characteristic scatter plot like fig. A attached (a narrow RMSD range within ~0.25A, while a majority stays exactly at 0.00A).
Hi:
Is there a rosetta or pyrosetta script (or general protocol) you would recommend for a pdb that already has a small molecule ligand docked in a low resolution docking model?
I used Zhang lab's BP Slim server to get this lo res docking, and now what I need to do is refine that model to high res, atomic scale.
thank you all so much, I am learning rapidly from this most generous and helpful community. - Amy
Hi: working with the D100_Docking.py script, have got past several errors but now stuck on this
I am contacting you because I am getting an error in results with Rosetta. Successfully finished protein-protein docking. I can see in the output that following lines complaining about missing atoms. I have prepared protein in ICM, Molsoft. I checked the input file those I have given as input.pdb, there were no missing any CB atoms in all amino acid. Docking finished successfully and generated score value. Do you think this missing atom will make any impact in score value? Let me know how can solve this problem.
Hi: I have researched this error I am getting, but don't see any reference to it. Thanks in advance for any help.
When I run
python D100_Docking.py --pdb_filename /81q1D100_Dock/ferudock81q1cds.clean.pdb --jobs 400 --job_output 81q1_docking_output --translation 3 --rotation 8 --PyMOLMover_ip off
I can't get past this error with the constant seed:
In [1]: import optparse
In [2]: from pyrosetta import *
Dear Ligand binding Team,
I am writting this letter of appreciation to thank the team of Rosie Ligand Docking for making available such a powerful docking tool for researchers. We recently used the tool and got wonderful results using a difficult protein (oxidosqualene cyclase). We also want to thank you for making rarely available docking tool based on Induced-Fit freely available to academic users.
We hope that you continue providing the Rosie tools and keep updating the excellent Ligand Docking tool.
I have performed a docking between a protein and a 15 residue peptide using flex pep dock. I have got a total score of around -1347, is this considered as good docking ? I am unable to predict whether the docking can be considered or not. Please help me. Thanks in advance:
The total score and other factors are as follows:
total_score |
I_sc |