# Structure prediction

## Unrecognized atom parameter with denovo_density

Category:
Structure prediction

I've run into an issue building a model using denovo_density in step 4D of this protocol: https://faculty.washington.edu/dimaio/files/rosetta_density_tutorial_aug18_4.pdf,

The rosetta command that throws the error is:

Post Situation:

## Clustering error - Help, please

Category:
Structure prediction

Hi, I'm trying to group structures into clusters, but I have an error and an empty log file. A few months ago (in February / March) I didn't have a problem with it, although I did it in the same way (I think so). I have no idea where this problem comes from.

Using the AbinitioRelax protocol, I obtained a silent file with 100,000 structures (centroid representations) for a certain amino acid sequence. Now I want to group the structures into clusters and sort by energy. I use the following commands:

Post Situation:

## metalloprotein ab initio with glutamic acid

Category:
Structure prediction

Hi all,

I'm new to rosetta design and looking to do ab initio folding for my first metalloprotein design. I saw the documentation (https://www.rosettacommons.org/docs/latest/application_documentation/structure_prediction/metalloprotein-abrelax), looked at the test inputs, and read the original paper. All of these only address His and Cys as ligands. Is there a way to do other ligands such as Glu or Asp?

Post Situation:

## RosettaCM: An internal error has occurred when "Running the Hybridize mover"

Category:
Structure prediction

Hello,

I am trying to replicate the tutorial for RosettaCM according to the following URL:

The step 1 (using setup_RosettaCM.py) is fine where I can obtain the thread pdb file and flags and rosetta_cm.xml.

But when I tried to run step 2 (Run the Hybridize mover). It crashed.

Post Situation:

## The difference between the H1 regions of modeled camelid antibody and the crystal structure.

Category:
Structure prediction

Dear all,

Post Situation:

## "Residue 7 was disulfide bonded but had no partner" with antibody.linuxgccrelease

Category:
Structure prediction

Dear all,

I am trying to modeling a camelid antibody with the sequence (nb.fasta) as following:

\$cat nb.fasta

>heavy

I use antibody.linuxgccrelease to model it:

Post Situation:

## Problems with mpi version of antibody.linuxgccrelease

Category:
Structure prediction

Dear all,

When I run the "antibody.mpi.linuxgccrelease", like

antibody.mpi.linuxgccrelease -fasta vhh.fasta -vhh_only | tee grafting.log

I always get the following strange information when the program approachs finishing and all grafted models have been produced:

Post Situation:

## The usage of antibody_H3.linuxgccrelease

Category:
Structure prediction

Dear all,

I am trying to use the antibody utinity to modeling a camelid antibody (vhh). I used the antibody.linuxgccrelease to produce 10 relaxed models for this  vhh sequence. Then I moved to do the H3 modeling. The "antibody_H3.linuxgccrelease --help" command shows many options for the antibody_H3.linuxgccrelease. However, I am a bit confused about the antibody_H3.linuxgccrelease options.

Post Situation:

## RosettaAntibodyDesign: How can I run the protocol without allowing design?

Category:
Structure prediction
Docking
Design

Hi there,

I am trying to use RosettaAntibodyDesigner without allowing any design elements of the protocol to occur. I understand 100% that this would remove the intended purpose and use cases of RAbD, however, I am trying to piecemeal a side-by-side comparison of a designed mAb (which works reat through this protocol) and a non-designed mAb.

However, I would like to ensure that both my simulations are executred identially otherwise. (ie., loop flexibility in docking, etc).

Is there any way to runn RAbD while FIXing all the CDRs?

Post Situation: