You are here

Home

Unsolved

The problem hasn't been solved

"Unhandled exception" error while running on Windows

Submitted by EricD on Tue, 2010-12-07 13:43

Hello,

I have successfully installed Rosetta3.1 on Windows 7 (64-bit) using Visual C++ 2005. I am trying to perform de novo structure determination.

Every time I try to run -prna, I am stopped halfway through and given the following error:
"Unhandled exception at 0x004e2a6f in rosetta++.vc.release.exe: oxC0000094: Integer divison by zero."

Google searching suggested I perform a reinstall, but I've tried and received the same error. I have very limited programming knowledge, so this error means nothing to me. Any help will be appreciated!

Thanks!

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
Rosetta++ - Build/Install

Specifying disulfide bonds

Submitted by msellers on Thu, 2010-12-02 10:38

I am finding that my structures generated with VMD containing disulfide bonds are not being preserved when used in PyRosetta. The sulfur atoms in the initial PDB are ~2.05 ang apart, but after a docking run they are as far as 11 ang. It seems that Rosetta automagically calculates disulfide energies--I am seeing non-zero values for "dslf_ss_*" in the .fasc output from docking, so I'm just wondering if there is something else I need to do.

Thanks.

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
PyRosetta - General

high resolution protein docking doesn't work

Submitted by albumns on Thu, 2010-12-02 02:36

Hi
I am using rosetta docking_protocol.linuxiccrelease @flags > docking.log for initial protein docking. 10000 initial pose(only backbone) were generated by this. Then I clustered top200 pose by cluster.linuxiccrelease @flags >& cluster.log &
The best scoring one from the largest cluster were submitted for rosetta refinement(add sidechain and hydrogens) :relax.linuxgccrelease @flags > log

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
Rosetta 3 - General

question about protein docking results

Submitted by albumns on Thu, 2010-11-25 08:19

Hi
I am using the docking_protocol.linux for high resolution complex. I found there are many parameters in *.fasc file such as:

fa_atr fa_dun fa_rep fa_sol hack_elec hbond_bb_sc hbond_lr_bb hbond_sc hbond_sr_bb interchain_contact interchain_env interchain_pair interchain_vdw.

So, I am wondering which one would be a measurement for final model selection?

BTW, could this protocol support MPI multiple CPU running?

THX

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
Rosetta 3 - General

packing option "explicit_h2o" and "solvate"

Submitted by SunH on Wed, 2010-11-17 00:03

Hi everyone,
Does anyone know whether the packing option "packing::explicit_h2o" and "packing::solvate" work out in Rosetta3.1?
This paper "A 'Solvated Rotamer' Approach to Modeling Water-Mediated Hydrogen Bonds at Protein–Protein Interfaces" said that Rosetta could recover water-mediated h-bond using a rotamer library called Solvated Rotamer. How to use it, add "explicit_h2o" or "solvate" flag ? But I read the code of Rosetta3.1 and couldn't find the source code implemented these two option.

Thanks!

Post Situation: 
Unsolved
Forums: 
Rosetta 3 - General

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Unsolved