You are here

Unsolved

The problem hasn't been solved

Rosetta 3.4 on Ubuntu 12.04 - g++-4.6 not found

Hi Rosettaers,

I am building Rosetta 3.4 on Unbuntu 12.04 running in VMWare player. I got the following error when I built it with scons bin mode=release:

Running versioning script ... fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git
Done. (0.1 seconds)
scons: done reading SConscript files.
scons: Building targets ...

Post Situation: 

RosettaDock - Constraints File

Hello, again.

I am attempting to run some global docking simulations of two proteins. Not much is known about the interaction; however, I do know residues that are not involved in forming the protein-protein interface. Is there a way to put this information into a constraints file so that decoys that use these residues are not considered (or thrown out)?

I know that having the line:
SiteConstraint CA 16B A FLAT_HARMONIC 0 1 5

Post Situation: 

header pathways not accessable: No such file or directory

I am trying to run a abinitio model and I have a missing header pathway error. My first error I picked up is this when i ran the code from rosetta_demos/abinitio/

core.scoring.ScoreFunctionFactory: SCOREFUNCTION PATCH: score12
protocols.jobdist.JobDistributors: Looking for an available job: 1 1 1

ERROR: [ERROR] invalid header input for kill_hairpins file.
ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/scoring/SS_Killhairpins_Info.cc line: 375

Post Situation: 

Abinitio error: ERROR: Value of inactive option accessed: -in:file:frag9

I hope this isn't a repost but I couldn't find anything here, I found a similar post on minirosetta but it wasn't solved. I built Rosetta and tried to run abinitio in the rosetta_demos using this command /rosetta3.4/rosetta_demos/abinitio$ ../../rosetta_source/bin/AbinitioRelax.linuxgccrelease -in::file::fasta ./input_files/1elwA.fasta

this is my script:
core.init: Mini-Rosetta version unknown from unknown
core.init: command: ../../rosetta_source/bin/AbinitioRelax.linuxgccrelease -in::file::fasta input_files/1elwA.fasta

Post Situation: 

Abinitio (3.4) Error: no fragment to compute secondary structure

Greetings,

When trying to run AbinitioRelax in Rosetta 3.4, we obtain the following error message:

ERROR: no fragment to compute secondary structure
ERROR:: Exit from: src/core/fragment/SecondaryStructure.cc line: 68

However, the fragment files seem to be read in correctly, based on the following output:

core.init: Mini-Rosetta version unknown from unknown

Post Situation: 

Backrub Params Files

I apologize in advance if this has been answered somewhere else, but I'm having trouble running the backrub program with non-canonical amino acids. Our designed protein includes a chromophore and I constructed a .params file that works with the fixbb application but I can't get backrub to recognize it. I tried renaming one of the atoms to act as a C-alpha for the pivot moves but it still doesn't work. I was just wondering if anyone knows how to get the .params files to work with backrub or if this is even the right was to recognize non-canonical amino acids.

Post Situation: 

The problem of compiling omp in Rosetta 3.4

When I execute the command:
./scons.py -j? extras=omp bin mode=dubug
I get the following error:
build/src/release/linux/2.6/64/x86/gcc/4.3/omp/libprotocols_a.2.so: undefined reference to `boost::this_thread::disable_interruption::disable_interruption()'
build/src/release/linux/2.6/64/x86/gcc/4.3/omp/libprotocols_a.2.so: undefined reference to `boost::detail::get_current_thread_data()'
build/src/release/linux/2.6/64/x86/gcc/4.3/omp/libprotocols_a.2.so: undefined reference to `boost::thread::~thread()'

Post Situation: 

D070_Refinement.py

Hi,

I'm trying to understand the D070_Refinement.py code posted by the Gray lab on PyRosetta.org. In short, the code basically makes small stabilizing backbone perturbations and repacks the sidechain of random residues in your pose. However, I don't know how many residues get perturbed/repacked. What input parameter specifies the # of residues that get perturbed? The "cycles" parameter is set 9 and is fed to the RepeatMover() function and the comments say that "cycles" affects the amount of sampling, but I'm not don't think think this is what I'm looking for.

Post Situation: 

Folding and Docking using Symmetry

Recently I was trying out the modes of Docking and Fold and Dock using symmetry, but I found that when I got the structures out, none of them were in the native form. The native structure is a dimer with 2 parallel monomers, but all of the structures had the 2 monomers in an antiparallel conformation. In order to understand where I went wrong I went back to the integration test to try it out, but I got antiparallel structures when creating this as well. I wanted to know if I was doing something wrong, had the wrong form of symmetry chosen, what it could be.

Post Situation: 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Unsolved