You are here

Unsolved

The problem hasn't been solved

Multi Ligand docking to a protein

Hi! I am new to PyRosetta and from Pure Life Science background.
I am trying to dock three ligands to a protein and I have gotten as far getting the my protein with concatenated ligand pdbs to be accepted as pose. I am having a block as to what I should do next.
Should I be following DockingProtocol() or is there any other set protocol?

I would appreciate any help in the right direction.

Thanks
Vaishnavi

Post Situation: 

Ligand creation

Hi guys,
I have some ligand structures in paper(overall structure). I want to convert those paper structure into pdb.(I have details about the bond order and bond distances).

So can someone can suggest me which is the best open source software to do this (I want to use generated ligand in liganddock application)

Thank in Advance
- K.Prasanth

Post Situation: 

Rosetta Holes and Packstat scoring

Hi, I'm trying to use rosetta holes to design a well packed 4-helix bundle around a Zn porphyrin. I'd like to use the hole_min energy weight to bias the design toward a well packed structure. It seems I want to increase the cavity probe radius, since holes does not seem to penalize the structures for very widely separated helices (i.e., a water molecule can definitely get in between the helices, so holes doesn't seem to penalize this, but I'd like it to.) So I'd like to increase the probe radius, and have holes (or packstat) rescore the structure accordingly.

Post Situation: 

Energy Minimization

Hi,

I searched for a basic protocol that can be used to minimize my four residue turn structure and I didn't find any. Therefore, I used the following method :-

scorefxn = create_score_function_ws_patch("standard","score12")
mm = MoveMap()
mm.set_bb(True)
pose_move_map.set_chi(True) ## For side chain minimization
mm.set_bb_true_range(1,4) ## Here range means 1 to 4 or the minimzation is applied only to residues 1 and4 ??

minmover = MinMover(mm, scorefxn, 'dfpmin', 10, True) ## I don't know the meaning of dfpmin,10,True. I saw it somewhere and used it

minmover.apply(pose)

Post Situation: 

Error while running RosettaLigand

Hi,everybody!!!
I am attempting to use the RosettaLigand application to Docking a ligand and protein, this is what I see:

core.init: Mini-Rosetta version unknown from unknown
core.init: command: /home/ryhon/workspace/rosetta34/build/src/debug/linux/2.6/64/x86/gcc/4.3/ligand_dock.default.linuxgccdebug @ligand_dock/TestSet/1EX7/flags.txt
core.init: 'RNG device' seed mode, using '/dev/urandom', seed=290165452 seed_offset=0 real_seed=290165452
core.init.random: RandomGenerator:init: Normal mode, seed=290165452 RG_type=mt19937
core.scoring.etable: Starting energy table calculation

Post Situation: 

Questions on rotamer-rotamer energies

I am working with calculating the rotamer-rotamer pairwise energies over the rotamer library for a fixed backbone. To do this I've essentially reimplemented the body of pack_rotamers_setup(), which ultimately calls RoatmersSet.calculate_energy(). I have a few questions on the topic, some of these are code-based others are to clear up my lack of biology background:

* What is the field RotamerSets.nmoltenres? This appears to be the number of rotamer positions, but is strictly less than the number of residues on the backbone. Shouldn't there be rotamers at every residue?

Post Situation: 

Trying to call pack_rotamers_setup()

The problem, in short, is that I'm trying to call pack_rotamers_setup(). The final argument is an InteractionGraphBaseOP pointer which can't be instantiated directly in Python.

I can get a subclass of InteractionGraphBase that I'm interested in, such as ig = DensePDInteractionGraph(n). There doesn't seem to be any way to dereference this and pack_rotamers_setup() doesn't like anything but a pointer to the base class as the last argument.

Post Situation: 

Binding energy contribution broken down by residue

Hi all,

I am successfully using InterfaceAnalyzer to get a binding score between a protein and a peptide.
InterfaceAnalyzer is great in that it breaks down the score into different parameters.
However, I am looking to break down the score contribution into the contribution by each residue.

For instance, I'd like to know the hydrogen bond contribution of residue 6 (this is made up, but illustrates the point).
Or perhaps I'd like to know the vdw for residue 10. Etc.

Post Situation: 

Fastsaxs

Hi
I am currentlt working with implementing saxs into the docking protocol. The only reference I have found is “Determination of the structures of symmetric protein oligomers from NMR chemical shifts and residual couplings” by Nikolaos G. Sgourakis et. Al.
Basically I have added the lines:

-score:saxs:ref_spectrum saxsdatafile.dat
-score:weights docking.wts

where I have copied the docking.wts file to my own directory and added the line
fastsaxs 2.5

Post Situation: 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Unsolved